I wasn’t feeling very well at the start of the week, but instead of going home sick I managed to struggle through by focussing on some fairly unchallenging tasks, namely continuing to migrate the STARN materials to the University’s T4 system. I’m still ploughing through the Walter Scott novels, but I made a bit of progress. I also spent a little more time this week on AHRC duties.
I had a few meetings this week. I met with the Heads of School Administration, Wendy Burt and Nikki Axford on Tuesday to discuss some potential changes to my job, and then had a meeting with Marc on Wednesday to discuss this further. The outcome of these meetings is that actually there won’t be any changes after all, which is disappointing but at least after several months of the possibility hanging there it’s all decided now.
On Tuesday I also had a meeting with Bryony Randall to discuss her current AHRC project about editing modernist texts. I have a few days of effort assigned to this project, to help create a digital edition of a short story by Virginia Woolf and to lead a session on transcribing texts at a workshop in April, so we met to discuss how all this will proceed. We’ve agreed that I will create the digital edition, comprising facsimile images and multiple transcriptions with various features visible or hidden. Users will be able to create their own edition by deciding which features to include or hide, thus making users the editors of their own edition. Bryony is going to make various transcriptions in Word and I am then going to convert this into TEI text. The short story is only 6 pages long so it’s not going to be too onerous a task and it will be good experience to use TEI and Oxygen for a real project. I’ll get started on this next week.
I met with Fraser on Wednesday to discuss the OED updates for the Historical Thesaurus and also to talk about the Hansard texts again. We returned to the visualisations I’d made for the frequency of Thematic headings in the two-year sample of Hansard that I was working with. I should really try to find the time to return to this again as I had made some really good progress with the interface previously. Also this week I arranged to meet with Catriona Macdonald about The People’s Voice project and published this week’s new song of the week on the Burns website (http://burnsc21.glasgow.ac.uk/robert-bruces-address-to-his-army-at-bannockburn/).
Gary had also stated that some ‘or’ searches were not showing multiple icons when different attributes were selected. However, after some investigation I think this may just be because without supplying limits an ‘or’ search for two attributes will often result in the attributes both being present at every location, therefore all markers will be the same. E.g. a search for ‘D3 or A9’. There are definitely some combinations of attributes that do give multiple markers, e.g. ‘Q6 or D32’. And if you supply limits you generally get lots of different icons, e.g. ‘D3, young, 4-5 or A9, old, 4-5’. Gary is going to check this again for any specific examples that don’t seem right.
After that I began to think about the new Atlas search options that Gary would like me to implement, such as being able to search for entire groups of attributes (e.g. an entire parent category) rather than individual ones. At the moment I’m not entirely sure how this should work, specifically how the selected attributes should be joined. For example, if I select the parent ‘AFTER’ with limits ‘old’ and ‘rating 4-5’ would the atlas only then show me those locations where all ‘AFTER’ attributes (D3 and D4) are present with these limits? This would basically be the same as an individual attribute search for D3 and D4 joined by ‘and’. Or would it be an ‘or’ search? I’ve asked Gary for clarification but I haven’t heard back from him yet.
I also made a couple of minor cosmetic changes to the atlas. Attributes within parent categories are now listed alphabetically by their code rather than their name, and selected buttons are now yellow to make it clearer which are selected and to differentiate from the ‘hover over’ purple colour. I then further reworked the ‘Atlas display options’ so that the different search options are now housed in an ‘accordion’. This hopefully helps to declutter the section a little. As well as accordion sections for ‘Questionnaire Locations’ and ‘Attribute Search’ I have added in new sections for ‘Advanced Attribute Search’ and ‘My Map Data’. These don’t have anything useful in them yet but eventually ‘Advanced Attribute Search’ will feature the more expanded options that are available via the ‘consistency data’ view – i.e. options to select groups of attributes and alternative ways to select ratings. ‘My Map Data’ will be where users can upload their own CSV files and possibly access previously uploaded datasets. See the following screenshot for an idea of how the new accordion works.
I also started to think about how to implement the upload and display of a user’s CSV files and realised that a lot of the information about how points are displayed on the map is not included in the CSV file. For example, there’s no indication of the joins between attributes or the limiting factors that were used to generate the data contained in the file. This would mean when uploading the data the system wouldn’t be able to tell whether the points should be displayed as an ‘and’ map or an ‘or’ map. I have therefore updated the ‘download map data’ facility to add in the URL used to generate the file in the first row. This actually serves two useful purposes. Firstly it means on re-uploading the file the system can tell which limits and Boolean joins were used and display an appropriate map and secondly it means there is a record in the CSV file of where the data came from and what it contains. A user would be able to copy the URL into their browser to re-download the same dataset if (for example) they messed up their file. I’ll continue to think about the implementation of the CSV upload facility next week.